Shafaq parast nigaahoun mein aa gayaa hoon mein!

Bahut khoob bahut khoob

Muhammed sa'b,
Meiney 'shafaq parast' ko 'watan parst' ya 'but parast' jaisey andaaz mein hi isteymaal kiyaa hai: yaani 'woh' jo 'andheyrey sey ujaaley' ki taraf ley ley jaaye! Yah 'tamsomaajyotirgamaya' jaisee hi baat hai!Aur 'Tasawwuraat ki baahoun' ka isteymaal 'takhaiul key aagosh' jaisaa huaa hai!
Meiney Urdu ki taaleem, eik chhoti-si masjid (Waisey 'khudaa kaa  ghar' to eik zarrey mein bhi samaa saktaa hai,naheen to saaree kayinaat bhi uskey 'ghar' key liye naaqaafee hai) key imaam sa'b sey mahaz eik maah, aur eik madarsey key noujawaan ustaad sey koyee do maah hi paayee thee. Ho saktaa hai iseeliye meyrey alfaaz aapko kuchh alag sey lagtey houn? Meyree taaleem Hindi, English aur ( kuchh had tak) Sanskrit mein huyee, jis sey meyrey Urdu kee 'rachnaaoun' mein 'Arbi'/ 'Faarsee' key alfaaz key saath Hindi/Sanskrit/English key 'samajh mein aasaanee sey aaney waaley' alfaaz ka bhi isteymaal hota rahtaa hai! ----- aur fir, 'shaayar' to 'likhney' ka kaam kartaa hai, 'padhney waaley' jaisaa unhain achchhaa lagey yaa jaisaa woh chaahain waisaa matlab nikaalain!!
                                        - abd bundeli
     

Muhammed sa'b,
 Aap ka kahnaa so-feesadee sahih hai! Iseeliye to, kalaam ko padhney waalaa, jaisaa matlab usey theek lagtaa hai, nikaal leytaa hai! Mirzaa Gaalib key saikrhoun ashaar aisey hain, jinkey matlab adbee biraadaree ney kayee-kayee nikaley hain. Hindi key 'Bihaari' ney bhi na jaaney kitneen 'gaagaroun mein saagar' bharey hain. Yah sab 'Suggestive Imagery', jisey Sanskrit mein 'dhwani' kahtey hain, kaa hi kamaal hai! 'Suggestive Imagery' ka isteymaal hi 'shaayar' ko oonchaaiyoun par pahunchaataa hai. Shakespeare aur Kalidas 'Suggestive Imagery' key isteymaal sey hi 'amar' ho chukey hain. Urdu ko adbee biraadariyoun ka jo 'dulaar-o-pyaar' milaa hai, us ka 'kaaran' bhi 'Suggestive Imagery' ka isteymaal hi hai!
                                      - abd bundeli

Muhammed sa'b,
'Shleel'-'Ashleel' kaa 'dhyaan' rakhanaa waajib to hai; par is kaa 'nirnaya' karnaa, ki, kyaa 'Shleel' hai, wa kyaa 'Ashleel' hai eik bey-had 'teidhee kheer' hai, because societies are constituted of people, and the societies constitute  'our' world, and also its demography! Today most of the societies are free (sovereign) to chose their constitutions, which are to be respected by all the constituents of this 'free world'. There was a time when great personalities like Socrates and Galileo were executed for religious innocence/intolerance; but today people are much wiser to realize the sanctity of scientifically proven truths. Even orthodox-affected people are readying themselves to come abreast with the enlightened ones. Today people like to depend on their own senses and wisdom, rather than what was said or spoken by the ancients or the like. I'm not talking about different faiths or religions as such, because I consider a religion to be a very personal matter: a relation in between an individual and his GOD or the like! The relation  between the soul of an individual, and the SOUL of the UNIVERSE is 'sovereign' in its own right, and can not be challenged. Hence, let us leave it to the LAW MAKER or the law makers to decide as to what is right or what is not right, under different situations of human existence, in different parts of the world. Let us enjoy, with all humility, the fruits provided by the God Almighty: as I understand none of HIS creations ever invite any kind of hatred what-so-ever. I do believe in descipline, but I don't like impositions which interfere with our personal liberties. 'Suggestive Imagery' key apney Daayre hain, woh unhain banaatee bhi hai, to torhtee bhi hai. 'Kaviyoun ki waanee' bhi unhain USEE sey miltee hai, aur WAHEE un par 'Lagaam' bhi 'Kastaa' hai! Haan, jo 'banaawatee kavi' hain unkey baawat 'wah lagaam' waajib hai.
                                 
                                                - abd bundeli         

Thanks a lot, Pooja!
            - abd bundeli